TCAM

Taxes are categorized by the impact they have on the placement of income and wealth. A proportional tax is a kind that imposes the same relative burden on every taxpayer—i.e., when tax liability and income grow in the same scale. A progressive tax is characterized by a higher than proportional rise in the tax onus relative to the rise in income, and a regressive tax is recognisable by a less than proportional rise in the comparable liability. So, progressive taxes are thought of as removing inequity in income distribution, but regressive taxes are found to result in increasing these inequalities.

The taxes that are normally thought to be progressive include individual income taxes and estate taxes. Income taxes that are nominally progressive, however, can become less so for the upper-income class—especially if a taxpayer is able to lessen his tax base by declaring deductions or by removing particular income parts from his taxable income. Proportional tax rates if applied to lower-income demographics could also be more progressive if such personal exemptions are made.

Income measured over a given period may not definitely provide the most accurate measure of taxpaying requirements. For example, transitory growth in income may be saved, and within temporary declines in income a taxpayer might opt to finance consumption by taking from savings. So, if taxation is held in comparison alongside “permanent income,” it should be less regressive (or more progressive) than when compared with annual income.

Sales taxes and excises (except luxuries) are usually regressive, because the portion of individual income consumed or spent for a specific good decreases as the rate of personal income grows. Poll taxes (also termed head taxes), levied as a set amount per capita, obviously are regressive.

It is complicated to term corporate income taxes and taxes on business as progressive, regressive, or proportionate, because of the lack of certainty about the ability of businesses to shift their tax expenses (see below Shifting and incidence). This difficulty of nominating who bears the tax burden lays essentially on whether a national or a subnational (that is, provincial or state) tax is being considered.

In assessing the economic purpose of taxation, it is relevant to differentiate between various concepts of tax rates. The statutory rates are nominated in the law; generally these are marginal rates, but occasionally they are average rates. Marginal income tax rates indicate the fraction of incremental income demanded by taxation when income rises by one dollar. Hence, if tax onus increases by 45 cents when income grows by one dollar, the marginal tax rate is 45 percent. Income tax regulations generally contain graduated marginal rates—i.e., rates that grow as income increases. Structured analysis of marginal tax rates need to take into account provisions in addition to the formal statutory rate structure. If, for example, a particular tax credit (reduction in tax) lessens by 20 cents for each one-dollar increase in income, the marginal rate is 20 percentage points more than nominated in the statutory rates. Since marginal rates specify how after-tax income changes in response to changes in before-tax income, they are the necessary ones for considering incentive effects of taxation. It is even more difficult to realise the marginal effective tax rate applicable to income from business and capital, as it may be dependant on factors including the structure of depreciation allowances, the deductibility of interest, and the provisions for inflation adjustment. A basic economic theorem determines that the marginal effective tax rate in income from capital is zero under a consumption-based tax.

Average income tax rates indicate the percentage of total income that is required in taxation. The pattern of average rates is the one that is necessary for judging the distributional equity of taxation. Under a progressive income tax the average income tax rate grows with income. Average income tax rates generally increase with income, both because personal allowances are allowed for the taxpayer and dependents and also because marginal tax rates are graduated; on the other hand, preferential treatment of income received for the most part by high-income households can dampen these effects, allowing regressivity, as signified by average tax rates that decline as income rises.

For MYOB Brisbane expert advice, contact Stone Consulting today. Stone Consulting also runs MYOB training in Brisbane.